Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Psychometric Testing of the Self-care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3.0

  • Victoria Vaughan Dickson
  • , Paolo Iovino
  • , Maddalena De Maria
  • , Ercole Vellone
  • , Rosaria Alvaro
  • , Roberta Di Matteo
  • , Alberto Dal Molin
  • , Maura Lusignani
  • , Barbara Bassola
  • , Antonio Maconi
  • , Tatiana Bolgeo
  • , Barbara Riegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: In this updated Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory (SC-CHDI) v3.0, items were added to better reflect the theory of self-care of chronic illness and revised based on recent research. The expanded SC-CHDI now reflects the theoretical concepts of self-care maintenance, monitoring, and management. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the SC-CHDI v3.0. Methods: In a sample of adults with coronary heart disease, we tested the SC-CHDI v3.0 validity with confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was calculated using Cronbach α, factor score determinacy coefficient, and global reliability index for multidimensional scales, with values > 0.70 considered adequate. Results: The sample (n = 205) was predominantly male (79%) with a mean age of 65.3 ± 11.1 years. The self-care maintenance scale encompassed 2 distinct behaviors, namely, “illness related behaviors” and “health promoting behaviors,” which reflect consulting and autonomous dimensions, respectively. The goodness-of-fit indices were adequate: χ2(25, N = 205) =31.86, P = .16, comparative fit index = 0.97, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.95, root mean square error of approximation = 0.04 (90% confidence interval, 0.00–0.07), P = .705, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.045. Analysis of the new self-care monitoring scale yielded a single factor; goodness-of-fit indices were excellent: χ2(12, N = 205) =11.56, P = .48, comparative fit index = 1.00, Tucker-Lewis Index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation < 0.001 (90% confidence interval, 0.000–0.07), P = .86, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.02. The self-care management scale had 2 dimensions of autonomous and consulting behavior with strong goodness-of-fit indices: χ2(7, N = 205) =6.57, P = .47, comparative fit index = 1.00, Tucker-Lewis Index = 1.00, root mean square error of approximation ≤ 0.001 (90% confidence interval, 0.00–0.08), P = .76, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.02. Reliability estimates were ≥0.80 for all scales. Conclusions: Our testing suggests that the SC-CHDI v3.0 is a sound measure of the essential elements of self-care for adults with coronary heart disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E131-E140
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • coronary heart disease
  • psychometric testing
  • self-care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Psychometric Testing of the Self-care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3.0'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this