Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pericardial tissue characterization with quantitative methods in cardiac magnetic resonance in acute or recurrent pericarditis

  • Luigi Tassetti
  • , Alice Bonomi
  • , Giulia Piccinni
  • , Alessandra Arcudi
  • , Marco Lionti
  • , Andrea Laghi
  • , Giuseppe Rocco Salvatore Patti
  • , Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
  • , Andrea Annoni
  • , Andrea Baggiano
  • , Giovanni Berna
  • , Ludovica Maria Carerj
  • , Francesco Cannata
  • , Fabrizio Celeste
  • , Alberico Del Torto
  • , Fabio Fazzari
  • , Alberto Formenti
  • , Antonio Frappampina
  • , Laura Fusini
  • , Sarah Ghulam Ali
  • Paola Gripari, Daniele Junod, Anna Maltagliati, Maria Elisabetta Mancini, Valentina Mantegazza, Riccardo Maragna, Francesca Marchetti, Saima Mushtaq, Manuela Muratori, Francesco Paolo Sbordone, Alessandra Volpe, Mauro Pepi, Gianluca Pontone

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance(CMR) is gaining importance for prognosis stratification of pericarditis,but data on quantitative evaluation of pericardial inflammation with CMR are currently limited. Aim of the study is to assess the utility of tissue characterization of pericardium with quantitative methods in outcome prediction of acute or recurrent pericarditis. Materials and methods: Consecutive patients who performed CMR for acute or recurrent pericarditis and > 6 months clinical follow up (FU) were enrolled. Quantitative evaluation of oedema and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) amount on pericardium with different techniques and T1/T2 maximum values on inflamed pericardium with mapping were performed. The continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD or median (IQR) as appropriate. Univariate/multivariate Cox regressions were used to investigate the association between the different CMR quantitative parameters and clinical outcome. Results: Sixty-one patients(mean age:48 ± 18 years; male:41 %) were enrolled, whose 46 (75 %) with acute pericarditis. Pericardial LGE median amount was 31.2(9;54.5), 42.7(17.2;72.5) and 38.8(15.2;69)cm3 when measured with FWHM, 5 and 6 SD, respectively. Median pericardial T1 and T2 values were 1356(1305;1523)ms and 77(73;81)ms, respectively. At 12 months FU, 20(32 %) patients reached the composite outcome including recurrence, constrictive evolution and right heart failure. Quantitative LGE, but neither T1 nor T2 mapping values nor T2w image, was associated to pericarditis recurrence and composite outcome in global cohort and to pericarditis recurrence in acute pericarditis cohort. Conclusion: Quantitative LGE evaluation with different techniques, but not parametric mapping, showed an association with clinical outcome prediction in acute and recurrent pericarditis, confirming LGE currently represents the most accurate imaging marker with prognostic value in this setting.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume439
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Acute pericarditis
  • Cardiac magnetic resonance
  • Quantitative late gadolinium enhancement
  • Recurrence pericarditis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pericardial tissue characterization with quantitative methods in cardiac magnetic resonance in acute or recurrent pericarditis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this