Ousia comme nom déverbal dans la philosophie première d’Aristote

[Machine translation] I. Introduction: the emergence of Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Roman times and the reader’s preliminary dilemma I.1. The emergence of Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Roman times. I.2. A bold contribution from textual history I.3. New perspectives on late-ancient commentarism I.4. First philosophy or ‘Metaphysics’? I.5. Is the tradition bypassable? I.6. The sine glossa reader and his preliminary dilemma I.7. Aristotle’s dialogical mood in his treatises on first philosophy II. ‘Being’ and the foundation of οὐσία as field for theoretical research by Aristotle II.1. Ontology as science of ‘being’ in Aristotle: the “what is-X in the middle II.2.A first caveat: the copula function of ‘being’ II.3. The definite article τό as quotation mark before inflected forms of 'to be': τὸ ὄν, τὸ εἶναι, τὸ ἔστιν II.4. Caveats on Aristotle's ‘being’ III. οὐσία, the focus of Aristotle’s first philosophy III.1. οὐσία as a prime meaning of a separable 'to be' III.2. οὐσία and the primacy criterion as a Plato’s legacy III.3. The dialectical roots of ontology III.4. οὐσία from Zeta to Lambda III.5. οὐσία as essence and οὐσία as substance III.6. οὐσία as a syntactical core and its Wortbildung III.7. οὐσία as a first being in Aristotle's first philosophy IV. Historicizing the semantic gap IV.1. οὐσία as a fil rouge in the order of the Metaphysics books IV.2. οὐσία in the 1st c. BC IV.3 οὐσία by Alexandre d´Aphrodisias IV.4. the 'Metaphysics' and its purpose: the role of book Lambda IV.5. Being and οὐσία: a lost relation over time.