Nonstructural safety of hospitals for disasters: A comparison between two capital cities

  • Ahmadreza Djalali
  • , Ali Ardalan
  • , Gunnar Ohlen
  • , Pier Luigi Ingrassia
  • , Francesco Della Corte
  • , Maaret Castren
  • , Lisa Kurland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective Hospitals are expected to function as a safe environment during disasters, but many become unusable because of nonstructural damage. This study compares the nonstructural safety of hospitals to disasters in Tehran and Stockholm. Methods Hospital safety in Tehran and Stockholm was assessed between September 24, 2012, and April 5, 2013, with use of the nonstructural module of the hospital safety index from the World Health Organization. Hospital safety was categorized as safe, at risk, or inadequate. Results All 4 hospitals in Stockholm were classified as safe, while 2 hospitals in Tehran were at risk and 3 were safe. The mean nonstructural safety index was 90% ± 2.4 SD for the hospitals in Stockholm and 64% ± 17.4 SD for those in Tehran (P =.014). Conclusions The level of hospital safety, with respect to disasters, was not related to local vulnerability. Future studies on hospital safety should assess other factors such as legal and financial issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-184
Number of pages6
JournalDisaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Keywords

  • Disaster
  • Hospital
  • Nonstructural
  • Safety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nonstructural safety of hospitals for disasters: A comparison between two capital cities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this