Abstract
[Machine translation] LC: «Excuse me, Sciascia, but I think 1912 + 1 is more an essay than a short story. What do you say?» LS: «The truth? I would like to have been walking alongside my reader, but instead I find myself running. It’s d’Annunzio’s fault. Gabriele is a would-be flâneur as well as a devotee – in keeping with the French adepte – of creating caricature through citation. And yet, whether we see this or not, he taught us to be students of ourselves, and to engage precisely at the point of intersection with language, which, in essence, is the rhetoric of nowhere and everywhere. With d’Annunzio, you’re always elsewhere – sorry, ailleurs – and yet with Him, too. My text, then, is an example of what perhaps today, in English (but why are you all speaking English?) would be called ‘a Personal Essay’».
| Translated title of the contribution | [Machine translation] Not only D'Annunzio: 1912+1 as an essay. |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 53-62 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | TODOMODO |
| Volume | IV |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- Critica dannunziana
- Gabriele d’Annunzio
- Filippo Tommaso Marinetti
- metascrittura
- Aldo Palazzeschi
- Giovanni Papini
- revenant
- Luigi Russolo
- saggio.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] Not only D'Annunzio: 1912+1 as an essay.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver