Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Multicentre clinical radiotherapy audit in rectal cancer: Results of the IROCA project

  • Magdalena Fundowicz
  • , Artur Aguiar
  • , Carla Lopes De Castro
  • , Maria Glòria Torras
  • , Letizia Deantonio
  • , Ewelina Konstanty
  • , Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska
  • , Miquel MacIa
  • , Eugeni Canals
  • , Monica Caro
  • , Carla Pisani
  • , Dorota Zwierzchowska
  • , Jaume Molero
  • , Arantxa Eraso
  • , Joana Lencart
  • , Carles Muñoz-Montplet
  • , Luisa Carvalho
  • , Marco Krengli
  • , Julian Malicki
  • , Ferran Guedea

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a clinical audit to assess adherence to standard clinical practice for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients undergoing radiotherapy for rectal cancer treatment in four European countries. Materials and methods: Multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study of 221 patients treated for rectal cancer in 2015 at six European cancer centres. Clinical indicators applicable to general radiotherapy processes were evaluated. All data were obtained from electronic medical records. Results: The audits were performed in the year 2017. We found substantial inter-centre variability in adherence to standard clinical practices: 1) presentation of cases at departmental clinical sessions (range, 0-100%) or multidisciplinary tumour board (50-95%); 2) pretreatment MRI (61.5-100%) and thoracoabdominal CT (15.0-100%). Large inter-centre differences were observed in the mean interval between biopsy and first visit to the radiotherapy department (range, 21.6-58.6 days) and between the first visit and start of treatment (15.1-38.8 days). Treatment interruptions ≥ 1 day occurred in 43.9% (2.5-90%) of cases overall. Treatment compensation was performed in 2.1% of cases. Treatment was completed in the prescribed time in 55.7% of cases. Conclusions: This multi-institutional clinical audit revealed that most centres adhered to standard clinical practices for most of the radiotherapy processes-related variables assessed. However, the audit revealed marked inter-centre variability for certain quality indicators, particularly inconsistent record keeping. Multiple targets for improvement and/or harmonisation were identified, confirming the value of routine clinical audits to detect potential deviations from standard clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number208
JournalRadiation Oncology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Aug 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multicentre clinical radiotherapy audit in rectal cancer: Results of the IROCA project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this