Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

[MISSCARE Survey - Italian Version: findings from an Italian validation study]

  • Luisa Sist
  • , Carla Contini
  • , Anna Bandini
  • , Stefania Bandini
  • , Licia Massa
  • , Roberta Zanin
  • , Rita Maricchio
  • , Gloria Gianesini
  • , ERIKA BASSI
  • , Daniela Tartaglini
  • , Alvisa Palese
  • , Annamaria Ferraresi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The Missed Nursing Care (MNC) refers to nursing interventions that are not completed, partially completed, or postponed. Despite the relevance of MNC, no assessment tools are available in the Italian context, and no data regarding the occurrence of this phenomenon has been documented on a large scale to date. Objectives: The study aims were: (1) to validate the Italian version of the MISSCARE Survey tool; (2) to measure the prevalence of missed interventions and reasons for missed care as perceived by clinical nurses working in Italian health care settings. Methods: After having conducted the forward and backward translation, pre-pilot and pilot phases were developed to ensure face and content validity as well as semantic and conceptual equivalence of the Italian version with the original version. The MISSCARE survey questionnaire was then distributed to 1,233 clinical nurses of whom 1,003 completed the questionnaire. Overall, 979 questionnaires were analysed. The questionnaires were completed from January to March 2012, by nurses working in medical and surgical hospital departments in the Emilia Romagna region of Italy. Construct validity and internal consistency of the instrument were assessed. Results: The face and content validity were ascertained by a group of experts. The instrument acceptability was good given that 79.4% of respondents replied to all items. Construct validity was investigated by an Exploratory Factor Analysis. Four factors explaining 64.18% of variance emerged: communication, lack of facilities/supplies, lack of staff, and unexpected events. Internal consistency, evaluated with Cronbach a, was 0.94. The nursing interventions omitted with greater frequency were, in order: ambulation (74.8%), passive mobilization (69.6%) and oral care (51.3%). The three main reasons for missed interventions were: an unexpected increase in the number of patients (90.5%), increased instability of the clinical condition (86.1%) and insufficient human resources (85.5%). Conclusions: The Italian version of the MISSCARE Survey was shown to have good psychometric properties. Therefore, it can be used to evaluate the missed nursing care phenomenon in Italy and will allow for international comparisons.
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)29-45
JournalIGIENE E SANITÀ PUBBLICA
Volume73
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Hospital Departments
  • Humans
  • Italy
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Health Care
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Communication
  • Equipment and Supplies
  • Nurse-Patient Relations
  • Nurses
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
  • Workload

Cite this