Minilaparotomy in spinal anaesthesia: A surgical choice in treatment of benign gynaecologic disease

Daniela Surico, Luca Mencaglia, Francesca Riboni, Alessandro Vigone, Livio Leo, Nicola Surico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Minilaparotomic access in spinal anaesthesia represents an example of mininvasive surgery and could be a valid cost-benefit alternative in the surgical treatment of benign gynaecologic diseases. Methods: The study is a randomized study. We analyzed a consecutive series of 80 patients treated for benign gynaecological diseases with spinal. (group A) or with general anaesthesia. (group B). Results: The median length of incision was 5 cm. The average operating time was 40.5 ± 9.39 min, without differences between groups. The average hospital stay was 0.71 days shorter. (p ≤ 0.0001) and the postoperative pain was lower at 2 and 6 h from the surgery and at 10 p.m. in the group A. (p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusions: Minilaparotomy in spinal anaesthesia carries advantages from economic point of view with reduction of length of stay in hospital which is an important parameter for the evaluation of the quality of surgical treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461-465
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume281
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010

Keywords

  • Minilaparotomy
  • Mininvasive surgery
  • Postoperative pain
  • Spinal anaesthesia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minilaparotomy in spinal anaesthesia: A surgical choice in treatment of benign gynaecologic disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this