Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mezzo secolo di «Quaderni Storici»: una storia redazionale a confronto

Translated title of the contribution: [Machine translation] Half a century of 'Historical Notebooks': a comparative editorial story

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Machine translation] The essay reconstructs and discusses the scientific history of a history journal (Historical Papers) since its foundation, and compares it with the discussions and transformations that have affected the practice of the discipline and the cultural work of history journals at national and international levels. It analyzes in an original way, and with specific references, continuity and discontinuity in editorial policies, and compares them with the wider debates that have animated the discipline. The contribution is part of a more general reflection that in recent years has concerned the transformation of the role of journals in scientific discussion, and the changes that have specifically affected their functioning, also due to the implications related to new forms of dissemination, and to the role of evaluating research. It is part of a journal issue (class A for historical disciplines) dedicated more generally to the topic, and therefore it is placed in dialogue with other contributions within it, and, potentially, with national and international literature on the subject of the role of scientific journals, which has recently become of very wide interest.
Translated title of the contribution[Machine translation] Half a century of 'Historical Notebooks': a comparative editorial story
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)113-131
Number of pages19
JournalRICERCHE STORICHE
VolumeLI
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Impatto e valutazione della ricerca storica.
  • Storia della storiografia
  • Storia delle riviste scientifiche

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] Half a century of 'Historical Notebooks': a comparative editorial story'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this