Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Matrices, not seeds. Vallisneri's research on mines: between empiricism and philosophy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Since the beginning of his scientific activity the physician and naturalist Antonio Vallisneri (1661-1730) devoted many studies to the Earth sciences. In those years his interest focused particularly on the features of mineral kingdom and its relationship with spring water. The first observations date back to the last decade of XVII century, when the author analysed the gypsum and sulphur veins on the Monte Gesso, in the Duchy of Modena and Reggio. Some years later, during one of his journeys across the northern Apennines in search for the origin of springs, Vallisneri reached the Este domain of Garfagnana. There he explored the iron caves of Fornovolasco: this experience allowed him to support his theory with many empirical information, later exposed in the Lezione Accademica intorno all’Origine delle Fontane (1715). The many data collected by Vallisneri encouraged him to outline a theoretical interpretation of mineral genesis. He supposed the mineral veins as developed by ‘seeds’ released in the Earth by God. The successful growth of ore veins, therefore, depended on the more or less favourable environment they would have found by accident. These ‘seeds’, as the author clarified, were not intended to be the very same of ‘perfect germs of generation’ typical of animals or plants. Rather, they were ‘matrices’ that had to be detected in order to exploit the wealth of mines posed, in a proper Leibnizian conception, ‘by God for world’s use’.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHistory of Research in Mineral Resources
PublisherInstituto Geologico y Minero de España
Pages105-112
Number of pages8
Volume13
ISBN (Print)9788478408566
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Matrices, not seeds. Vallisneri's research on mines: between empiricism and philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this