L'istituzione assente. Il nesso diritto-teologia, a partire da Jacques Ellul, tra libertà e ipermoderno

Translated title of the contribution: [Machine translation] The institution is absent. The link between law and theology, starting with Jacques Ellul, between freedom and hypermodernity

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract

[Machine translation] The volume analyzes Jacques Ellul's philosophy of law, with particular reference to the link between theology and law in some writings of the immediate post-war period, against the background of the question of technique (the link between technique and the myth of creation). The traditional Catholic naturalist approach is thus superimposed on the problem of the institution in its relationship with Revelation as a form of God's justice, with reference to specific biblical texts (Apocalypse, Gospel of Luke). Starting from this approach, through the configuration of the problematic link between belief and knowledge, the recent Catholic theory of the phenomenology of Jesus is analyzed, in order to reopen the debate surrounding the notion of justice in a sense that is not merely legal, but linked to a theory of the foundation linked to the institutional action of man. The legal debate of the second half of the last century on the notion of institution is therefore read critically and accused of an implicit anthropological reductionism, considered to be transcended.
Translated title of the contribution[Machine translation] The institution is absent. The link between law and theology, starting with Jacques Ellul, between freedom and hypermodernity
Original languageItalian
PublisherGiappichelli
Number of pages185
Volume1
ISBN (Print)9788834810330
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Keywords

  • testo
  • credere
  • sapere
  • istituzione
  • teologia del diritto
  • apocalisse
  • immagine
  • protestantesimo

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] The institution is absent. The link between law and theology, starting with Jacques Ellul, between freedom and hypermodernity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this