Libertà nell'intesa e libertà dall'intesa. Osservazioni a margine di due recenti sentenze della Corte costituzionale

Translated title of the contribution: [Machine translation] Freedom in understanding and freedom from understanding. Remarks in the margins of two recent Constitutional Court judgments

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Machine translation] The constitutional models of the relationship between law and belief provided in Italy are crossed and put under stress by new requests for equality. In relation to a constitution that took into consideration the freedom of conscience, in the best meaning of believing in a religion, atheists have claimed the right to access, like the non-Catholic religious groups, to negotiations with the government to conclude an agreement pursuant to art. 8, co. 3. Following such initiative, the Constitutional Court, within the jurisdictional dispute between powers, has set some important principles regarding freedom of atheism, in the more complex framework of relations between freedom of conscience, equality and political discretion.
Translated title of the contribution[Machine translation] Freedom in understanding and freedom from understanding. Remarks in the margins of two recent Constitutional Court judgments
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)437-456
Number of pages20
JournalPolitica del Diritto
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Entente
  • Freedom of Atheism
  • Freedom of Conscience
  • Notion of Religious Confession
  • Political Discretion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] Freedom in understanding and freedom from understanding. Remarks in the margins of two recent Constitutional Court judgments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this