Lemmings in the crowd: Success and failure of crowdfunding platforms

Eliana Baici, Laura Capraro, Martin Zagler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of success and failure of crowdfunding. We have drawn a random sample of 120 crowdfunding initiatives from the crowdfunding platforms Kickstarter and Indiegogo. We extracted relevant characteristics of the project and tracked their performance over a 30 day period. Using probit models, GLS estimators and dynamic panel methods, we estimated success probabilities. We found that crowdfunding is extremely persistent, and early success in attracting financing will improve the chance to get funded in the end. Presentation and instant gratification matters, as do moderate financial goals. We have not found any sectoral bias, which would be a direct indication of market inefficiencies. However, we observe a bias towards projects launched by all male project teams. There are no obvious explanations for this gap, so we must conclude that crowdfunding exhibits a gender bias.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-350
Number of pages14
JournalRivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Crowdfunding
  • Dynamic panel
  • Gender bias
  • Indiegogo
  • Kickstarter
  • Persistence
  • Success

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lemmings in the crowd: Success and failure of crowdfunding platforms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this