Abstract
This study examines the impact of an additional relocation component of need-based
scholarships on academic performance. Exploiting an Italian policy that assigns a
higher grant to recipients residing more than 60 min from the university, we implement
a fuzzy regression discontinuity design to estimate a local average treatment
effect for students at the margin of the travel time cutoff.We find that scholarship recipients
induced to relocate accumulate fewer credits and obtain lower average grades
than comparable commuting scholarship holders. The results are robust to alternative
bandwidth choices and placebo tests. Exploratory analyses suggest that program
characteristics and economic vulnerability may explain part of the performance gap,
although indirect effects are small relative to the direct effect. Overall, the findings
suggest that, for marginal low-income students, relocation eligibility is associated
with weaker academic progression. The results apply to scholarship beneficiaries near
the policy threshold and should be interpreted as local effects within this institutional
context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Italian Economic Journal |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 3 Jun 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Scholarships · Higher education · Academic performance · Living arrangements · Regression discontinuity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Leaving Home for University or Commuting? The Impact of Relocation Scholarships on Academic Progression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver