Abstract
[Machine translation] The contribution analyzes the decision n. 54/2024 of the Constitutional Court in which it comes, The question of the constitutional legitimacy of provisions that sanction has been declared unfounded, the failure to declare or communicate gambling winnings by income earners of, citizenship or such aspirants. The ruling of the Constitutional Court offers some food for thought, on the relationship between play and work and on the role that work ethics plays in relation to, conditionalities related to social inclusion tools., The essay analyzes the Constitutional Court judgement no. 54/2024 on constituitional, compatibility of the loss of citizenship income for those who are holders of gross gambling, winnings. The Constitutional Court’s ruling is the occasion for a reflection about conditionality and, ethics of work.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Machine translation] Measures to combat poverty between solidarity aspirations and inevitable conditionality. Note to the Constitutional Court, judgment n. 54 of 2024 |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-14 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | OSSERVATORIO COSTITUZIONALE |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
Keywords
- vincite al gioco
- rapporto gioco-lavoro
- misure di contrasto alla povertà
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] Measures to combat poverty between solidarity aspirations and inevitable conditionality. Note to the Constitutional Court, judgment n. 54 of 2024'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver