Abstract
[Machine translation] . For Koselleck utopia is become, It was a central and decisive concept of modernity, while ascesis appears, in a position that is certainly secondary and relatively unimportant. In short,, As soon as it follows, I will try to present the German historian's contribution to, Twentieth century discussion on these two issues from a political history perspective, of historiography.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Machine translation] Kritik und Krise: a classic tested by history. 65 years after Reinhart Koselleck's 'utopian criticism' |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Title of host publication | Utopia e politiche dell’ascesi secolare. Pratiche e modelli |
| Publisher | Edizioni dell'Orso |
| Pages | 103-112 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Volume | 2 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-88-3613-559-2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Koselleck utopia crisi critica
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] Kritik und Krise: a classic tested by history. 65 years after Reinhart Koselleck's 'utopian criticism''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver