TY - JOUR
T1 - IRON
T2 - A retrospective international multicenter study on robotic versus laparoscopic versus open approach in gallbladder cancer
AU - IRON Study Collaborative Group
AU - Ielpo, Benedetto
AU - Vittoria d'Addetta, Maria
AU - Cremona, Simone
AU - Podda, Mauro
AU - Di Martino, Marcello
AU - Di Franco, Gregorio
AU - Furbetta, Niccoló
AU - Comandatore, Annalisa
AU - Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo
AU - Morelli, Luca
AU - Vittoria d'Addetta, Maria
AU - Burdio, Fernando
AU - Sanchez-Velazquez, Patricia
AU - Vellalta, Gemma
AU - Villamonte, Maria
AU - Mastrangelo, Mattia
AU - Mazzone, Chiara
AU - Masetti, Michele
AU - Offi, Maria Fortuna
AU - Geraldi, Eleonora
AU - Aldrighetti, Luca
AU - Ingallinella, Sara
AU - Ratti, Francesca
AU - Rosso, Edoardo
AU - De Blasi, Vito
AU - Anselmo, Alessandro
AU - Conte, Luigi Eduardo
AU - Memeo, Riccardo
AU - Delvecchio, Antonella
AU - Sukandy, Iswanto
AU - Moraldi, Luca
AU - Grazi, Gian Luca
AU - Spampinato, Marcello G.
AU - D'Ugo, Stefano
AU - Heng Chiow, Adrian Kah
AU - Yi Yee, Francis Zheng
AU - Tan, Hiang Jin
AU - Thiruchelvam, Nita
AU - Lancellotti, Francesco
AU - Satyadas, Thomas
AU - Fedi, Massimo
AU - De Vincenti, Rosita
AU - Leo, Francesca
AU - Pesi, Benedetta
AU - Belli, Andrea
AU - Izzo, Francesco
AU - Cutolo, Carmen
AU - Romano, Fabrizio
AU - Scotti, Mauro Alessandro
AU - Donadon, Matteo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Objective: For patients with T1b gallbladder cancer or greater, an adequate lymphadenectomy should include at least 6 nodes. Studies comparing short- and long-term outcomes of the open approach with those of laparoscopy and robotic approaches are limited, with small sample sizes, and there are none comparing laparoscopic and robotic approaches. This study compared patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, and open resection of gallbladder cancer, evaluating short- and long-term outcomes. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients with T1b gallbladder cancer or greater (excluding combined organ resection and T4) who underwent open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection and lymphadenectomy between January 2012 and December 2022. The 3 groups were matched in terms of patient baseline and disease characteristics based on propensity score matching, comparing robotic with open and robotic with laparoscopic groups. Results: We enrolled 575 patients from 37 institutions. After propensity score matching, the median number of harvested nodes was higher in the robotic group than in the open (7 vs 5; P =.0150) and laparoscopic groups (7 vs 4; P <.001). The Pringle maneuver time was shorter with robotic resection than with laparoscopy (38 vs 59 minutes; P =.0034), and the robotic group also had a lower conversion rate (3% vs 14%, respectively; P =.005) and less estimated blood loss than open and laparoscopic resections. The perioperative morbidity and mortality rates did not differ. The robotic and laparoscopic approaches were associated with faster functional recovery than the open group. In the multivariate analysis, the factors related to the retrieval of at least 6 nodes were the robotic approach over open (odds ratio, 5.1529) and over laparoscopy (odds ratio, 6.7289) and the center experience (≥20 minimally invasive liver resections/year) (odds ratio, 4.962). After a mean follow-up of 42.6 months, overall survival and disease-free survival were not different between groups. Conclusion: Compared with open and laparoscopic surgeries, the robotic approach for gallbladder cancer performed in a center with appropriate experience in minimally invasive surgery can provide adequate node retrieval.
AB - Objective: For patients with T1b gallbladder cancer or greater, an adequate lymphadenectomy should include at least 6 nodes. Studies comparing short- and long-term outcomes of the open approach with those of laparoscopy and robotic approaches are limited, with small sample sizes, and there are none comparing laparoscopic and robotic approaches. This study compared patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, and open resection of gallbladder cancer, evaluating short- and long-term outcomes. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients with T1b gallbladder cancer or greater (excluding combined organ resection and T4) who underwent open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection and lymphadenectomy between January 2012 and December 2022. The 3 groups were matched in terms of patient baseline and disease characteristics based on propensity score matching, comparing robotic with open and robotic with laparoscopic groups. Results: We enrolled 575 patients from 37 institutions. After propensity score matching, the median number of harvested nodes was higher in the robotic group than in the open (7 vs 5; P =.0150) and laparoscopic groups (7 vs 4; P <.001). The Pringle maneuver time was shorter with robotic resection than with laparoscopy (38 vs 59 minutes; P =.0034), and the robotic group also had a lower conversion rate (3% vs 14%, respectively; P =.005) and less estimated blood loss than open and laparoscopic resections. The perioperative morbidity and mortality rates did not differ. The robotic and laparoscopic approaches were associated with faster functional recovery than the open group. In the multivariate analysis, the factors related to the retrieval of at least 6 nodes were the robotic approach over open (odds ratio, 5.1529) and over laparoscopy (odds ratio, 6.7289) and the center experience (≥20 minimally invasive liver resections/year) (odds ratio, 4.962). After a mean follow-up of 42.6 months, overall survival and disease-free survival were not different between groups. Conclusion: Compared with open and laparoscopic surgeries, the robotic approach for gallbladder cancer performed in a center with appropriate experience in minimally invasive surgery can provide adequate node retrieval.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85198743896
U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.045
DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.045
M3 - Article
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 176
SP - 1008
EP - 1015
JO - Surgery
JF - Surgery
IS - 4
ER -