Abstract
The World Health Report 2000 proposed three fundamental goals for health systems encompassing population health, health care finance and health systems responsiveness. The goals incorporate both an efficiency and equity dimension. While inequalities in population health and health care finance have motivated two important strands of research, inequalities in responsiveness have received less attention in health economics. This paper examines inequality and polarisation in responsiveness, bridging this gap in the literature and contributing towards an integrated analysis of health systems performance. It uses data from the World Health Survey to measure and compare inequalities in responsiveness across 25 European countries. In order to respect the inherently ordinal nature of the responsiveness data, median-based measures of inequality and polarisation are employed. The results suggest that, in the face of wide differences in the health systems analysed, there exists large variability in inequality in responsiveness across countries.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 616-625 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Health Economics |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Health systems' responsiveness
- Inequality
- Ordered response data
- Polarisation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Inequality and polarisation in health systems' responsiveness: A cross-country analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver