Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges unrelated to supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

  • Eraldo Occhetta
  • , Miriam Bortnik
  • , Andrea Magnani
  • , Gabriella Francalacci
  • , Paolo Marino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims: The development of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) with QRS morphology discrimination and dual-chamber sensing capabilities has improved the differentiation of supraventricular from ventricular tachycardias (VTs). Inappropriate ICD discharges may result from extracardiac signals caused by electromagnetic interference (EMI), because of electric fields and leakage currents from domestic or medical electrical devices, damaged sensing leads, and various cardiac and extracardiac signals that mimic VT and/or ventricular fibrillation. The aim of our study was to determine retrospectively the incidence and clinical relevance of these ICD behaviours and offer possible therapeutic solutions. Methods and results: We have observed inappropriate discharges unrelated to supraventricular arrhythmias in 13 (3.9%) of the 336 patients implanted with ICDs in our centre from 1989 to 2005. Seven patients received inappropriate shocks following exposure to external EMI: improperly grounded electric stove, electrically powered watering system, hydro-massage bath, electrical pruner, electrocautery current during cardiac surgery, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation. In four patients, spurious discharges were related to internal noise of the ICD system from inappropriate lead connections. In two cases, erroneous antitachycardia therapy was delivered following different body signals oversensing (T-wave oversensing, wide QRS double-counting and myopotentials). In nine patients, non-invasive solutions prevented further inappropriate therapies (avoidance of EMI, malfunctioning atrial lead exclusion, ventricular sensing reprogramming). In four patients, surgical revision of the system was required (lead connections or position revision). Conclusion: In our experience, inappropriate ICD discharges unrelated to supraventricular arrhythmias occurred in about 4% of ICD patients. A careful evaluation of clinical data and telemetric information (lead impedance, sensed R-wave, stored electrograms) is essential in order to understand the nature of inappropriate ICD discharges and to select the most appropriate solution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)863-869
Number of pages7
JournalEuropace
Volume8
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Electromagnetic interference
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Inappropriate therapies
  • Oversensing
  • Troubleshooting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges unrelated to supraventricular tachyarrhythmias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this