Abstract
A poor use of mental health services has been described in immigrants. We compared the sociodemographic, clinical and treatment features of immigrants and natives attending a Community Mental Health Centre (CMHC). 191 immigrants and 191 randomly selected natives applying to the Borgomanero CMHC between 1 January 2003 and 31 August 2013 were compared. Our sample consisted mainly of the so-called “economic” immigrant. Adjustment disorders and reaction to stress were the most frequent diagnoses; in most cases symptoms onset occurred after migration. Although treatment features overlapped in the two groups (duration, number of contacts), immigrants showed a higher frequency of treatment dropout. While it is necessary to improve access to mental health services for immigrants, for the “economic” immigrant it may be more important to focus on establishing a therapeutic relationship that can be experienced as reliable and trustworthy. The finding of similar pathways to access the CMHC in natives and immigrants is encouraging.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 878-885 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Community Mental Health Centre (CMHC)
- Immigrants
- Race/ethnicity
- Treatment access
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Immigrants’ Pathways to Outpatient Mental Health: Are there Differences with the Native Population?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver