Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

IL MITO DI PROCRUSTE. IL PROBLEMA DELL'INTERPOSIZIONE DELLE NORME GENERATIVE DI OBBLIGHI INTERNAZIONALI NEI GIUDIZI DI LEGITTIMITÀ COSTITUZIONALE

Translated title of the contribution: [Machine translation] THE MYTH OF PROCRUSTE. THE PROBLEM OF THE INTERPOSITION OF GENERATIVE NORMS OF INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS IN JUDGMENTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Machine translation] The investigation is aimed at exploring the complexity of the category of generative norms of international obligations in relation to the prospects of interposition in the judgment of constitutional legitimacy, to those already established and to those that could be reversed, given the prescriptive potential of art. 117 I co., with the main objective of testing what the repercussions could be in the physiology of constitutional justice.
Translated title of the contribution[Machine translation] THE MYTH OF PROCRUSTE. THE PROBLEM OF THE INTERPOSITION OF GENERATIVE NORMS OF INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS IN JUDGMENTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)250-281
Number of pages31
JournalRIVISTA AIC
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • GIUDIZI DI LEGITTIMITÀ COSTITUZIONALE
  • INTERPOSIZIONE
  • OBBLIGHI INTERNAZIONALI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] THE MYTH OF PROCRUSTE. THE PROBLEM OF THE INTERPOSITION OF GENERATIVE NORMS OF INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS IN JUDGMENTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this