Abstract
This paper attempts a rational explanation of the big stylized facts that were the hallmark of the socialist economies: high investment rates, high levels of environmental depletion and defense expenditure. In contrast to the dominant approach in comparative economics, which relies on bureaucratic and/or political preferences, a simple median-voter model yields this structure of national output as the utility-maximizing choice of a decisive voter faced with a redistribution of income that takes the form of collectivization of capital accumulation, whose burden is borne more than proportionally by higher-income groups. This basic model is then extended to deal with different specifications of the political process, different degrees of centralization of decision-making, and the territorial dimension of redistribution.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 257-280 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | European Journal of Political Economy |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 1999 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Collectivization
- D 72
- H 42
- Investment
- P 51
- Pollution
- Redistribution
- Socialism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Heavy investment and high pollution as rational choices under socialism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver