Abstract
The paper focuses on the traditional purpose of pre-trial detention (and other precautionary measures) to prevent specific risks. While liberty is the rule, before conviction, pre-trial detention is an absolute exception, competing with the opposite principle of the presumption of innocence: providing valuable and accurate justification for balancing the interest to prevent risk with the presumption of innocence is an overarching difficulty for judges, in the whole western world. Which the solutions? The paper reflects and compares the traditional solution of legal presumptions with the newer trend of actuarial assessment tools, based on psycho-criminological theories, based on the Italian and the US federal systems.
| Translated title of the contribution | Prevedere il futuro indagando il passato. L'uso di modelli computazionali nelle decisioni cautelari |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 1859-1896 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Behavior
- Legal presumption
- Pre-trial detention
- Prediction
- Presumption of innocence
- Risk assessment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Forecasting the future while investigating the past. The use of computational models in pre-trial detention decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver