Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis: Interim analysis results at Week 12 from the GULLIVER study

  • C. Bonifati
  • , S. Lembo
  • , A. G. Richetta
  • , M. Romanelli
  • , F. Satolli
  • , M. Corazza
  • , L. Atzori
  • , C. Lasagni
  • , C. Potenza
  • , P. Savoia
  • , F. Bardazzi
  • , V. G. Di Lernia
  • , L. Bianchi
  • , G. Fabbrocini
  • , C. Giofrè
  • , L. Zichichi
  • , C. Guarneri
  • , S. Pallotta
  • , M. C. Fargnoli
  • , F. Loconsole
  • A. Offidani, M. Burlando, S. Piaserico, K. Peris, M. Papini, C. G. Carrera, A. Costanzo, F. Prignano, M. R. Bongiorno, P. Dapavo, L. Stingeni, M. Donini, G. Micali, F. Rongioletti, G. Stinco, T. Gramiccia, G. Cantini, G. Argenziano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Facial (FP) and genital psoriasis (GP) significantly affect patients' quality of life. Despite the advances in treatments, limited data on efficacy and safety are available on these difficult-to-treat areas. Guselkumab is an interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor which has been proven effective in treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Objectives: The aim of this interim analysis was to report the efficacy and safety of guselkumab in the treatment of patients with FP and/or GP. Materials and Methods: GULLIVER is a 52-week Italian observational study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of guselkumab in a real-life setting in patients with FP and/or GP. Adult patients with facial and/or genital moderate-to-severe psoriasis (sPGA score ≥ 3) were included. The primary endpoint of this analysis was the percentage of patients achieving a facial or genital sPGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear), at Week 12. The change in the score of the facial or genital sPGA components in patients with a score ≥3 for each sPGA component was assessed. PASI score in patients with a baseline PASI above or below 10 was evaluated. Results: Overall, 351 patients were included in the study; 83.3% of FP and 76.5% of GP patients achieved the primary endpoint. Similar response rates were observed for the facial or genital sPGA components in patients with a baseline facial or genital sPGA score ≥3 in each component. Among patients with a baseline PASI score >10, mean PASI score improved from 19.0 (SD 8.3) to 2.2 (SD 4.8). Forty-four AEs were observed in 32 patients; two mild and transient AEs (fatigue and nausea) were considered treatment related. No SAEs were observed. Conclusions: Guselkumab, showing to be effective and safe in treating FP and GP, may be a valid therapeutic option for patients with psoriasis localized in these difficult-to-treat areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-14
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Volume39
Issue numberS1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis: Interim analysis results at Week 12 from the GULLIVER study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this