Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diverse effects of natural and synthetic surfactants on the inhibition of staphylococcus aureus biofilm

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

A major challenge in the biomedical field is the creation of materials and coating strategies that effectively limit the onset of biofilm-associated infections on medical devices. Biosurfactants are well known and appreciated for their antimicrobial/anti-adhesive/anti-biofilm properties, low toxicity, and biocompatibility. In this study, the rhamnolipid produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 89 (R89BS) was characterized by HPLC-MS/MS and its ability to modify cell surface hydrophobicity and membrane permeability as well as its antimicrobial, anti-adhesive, and anti-biofilm activity against Staphylococcus aureus were compared to two commonly used surfactants of synthetic origin: Tween® 80 and Triton™ X-100. The R89BS crude extract showed a grade of purity of 91.4% and was composed by 70.6% of mono-rhamnolipids and 20.8% of di-rhamnolipids. The biological activities of R89BS towards S. aureus were higher than those of the two synthetic surfactants. In particular, the anti-adhesive and anti-biofilm properties of R89BS and of its purified mono-and di-congeners were similar. R89BS inhibition of S. aureus adhesion and biofilm formation was ~97% and 85%, respectively, and resulted in an increased inhibition of about 33% after 6 h and of about 39% after 72 h when compared to their chemical counterparts. These results suggest a possible applicability of R89BS as a protective coating agent to limit implant colonization.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1172
JournalPharmaceutics
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Anti-adhesive/anti-biofilm agents
  • Antimicrobial activity
  • Biofilm dispersal
  • Biosurfactants
  • HPLC-MS
  • Rhamnolipids

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diverse effects of natural and synthetic surfactants on the inhibition of staphylococcus aureus biofilm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this