Abstract
In this paper the author reflects on the constitutional rights at the end of life, distinguishing between those who have a sure constitutional foundation, such as the right to not suffer and the right to refuse therapeutic treatments even life-saving, and the claims of dignified death like euthanasia, with respect to which the Constitution does not say in a binding way, and the choice-between right and crime-should be reserved for the democratically elected legislator.
| Translated title of the contribution | Rights at the end of life and constitution |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 405-418 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | BioLaw Journal |
| Volume | 2019 |
| Issue number | Specialissue2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rights at the end of life and constitution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver