Abstract
We consider a sample of about 700 people, interviewed on the streets, who are sorted into two groups by a self-report, screening questionnaire: namely, non-problematic gamblers/non-gamblers and problematic gamblers. Within each group, we compare both social (perceived) stigma and self-perceived (experienced) stigma, measured by means of other two self-report questionnaires, and we seek for relations between stigma and socio-demographic variables that can help targeting possible interventions to reduce gambling-related stigma. We, then, compare stigma between the two groups of non-(problematic) gamblers and problematic ones, and we also check the hypothesis that higher social stigma is related to higher self-perceived stigma, as well as higher stigma is related to lesser help-seeking. The latter hypothesis is of utmost importance, given that stigma is recognised to be one of the major causes for hindering help-seeking by problematic gamblers. The research is carried out in Italy, one of the first countries in the world for the money spent per capita in gambling activity every year.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 333-351 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Gambling Studies |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2022 |
Keywords
- Dimensions of gambling-related stigma
- Italy
- Psychometric tools
- Qualitative and quantitative analysis
- Social and self-perceived stigma
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in Perceived and Experienced Stigma Between Problematic Gamblers and Non-gamblers in a General Population Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver