Differences in Perceived and Experienced Stigma Between Problematic Gamblers and Non-gamblers in a General Population Survey

Chiara Andrà, Gabriele Priolo, Francesca Merlin, Claudia Chiavarino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We consider a sample of about 700 people, interviewed on the streets, who are sorted into two groups by a self-report, screening questionnaire: namely, non-problematic gamblers/non-gamblers and problematic gamblers. Within each group, we compare both social (perceived) stigma and self-perceived (experienced) stigma, measured by means of other two self-report questionnaires, and we seek for relations between stigma and socio-demographic variables that can help targeting possible interventions to reduce gambling-related stigma. We, then, compare stigma between the two groups of non-(problematic) gamblers and problematic ones, and we also check the hypothesis that higher social stigma is related to higher self-perceived stigma, as well as higher stigma is related to lesser help-seeking. The latter hypothesis is of utmost importance, given that stigma is recognised to be one of the major causes for hindering help-seeking by problematic gamblers. The research is carried out in Italy, one of the first countries in the world for the money spent per capita in gambling activity every year.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-351
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Gambling Studies
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Dimensions of gambling-related stigma
  • Italy
  • Psychometric tools
  • Qualitative and quantitative analysis
  • Social and self-perceived stigma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in Perceived and Experienced Stigma Between Problematic Gamblers and Non-gamblers in a General Population Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this