Di alcuni motivi nel canone minore di Rocco Ronchi

[Machine translation] The article participates in the Symposium that the magazine “Ethics & Politics” hosted in honor of Rocco Ronchi's volume, The Lesser Canon. Towards a philosophy of nature (Feltrinelli, Milan 2017). The symposium includes six articles by philosophers and one by the psychoanalyst Massimo Recalcati, with a conclusion-response from the author. , This contribution intends to highlight the meaning of the expression 'minor canon', referring it not only to minor authors of the Western philosophical tradition, but translating it into terms of a 'different faithfulness' to authors representing the major line of that tradition. This makes it possible to redeem some currents of thought that Ronchi assigns to the greater canon, such as hermeneutics and the philosophy of history. Furthermore - and this is the focus of the article - it allows us to work fruitfully on an author much criticized by Ronchi, who is Edmund Husserl, whose significant and unexpected similarities are identified with Ronchi's proposal of a philosophy of absolute immanence. This is also thanks to the contribution of some exponents of post-Husserlian phenomenology, considered Husserl's “heretics” (Levinas, Merleau-Ponty, Ricoeur, Waldenfels) (par. 1). They are then addressed: the Husserlian theme of the correlation of consciousness and the world (par. 2), as emerging from experience and not to be understood according to the classical and oppositional scheme of subject and object; the theme of the intraconscious noetic-noematic correlation (par. 3), which does not erase the alterity of the phenomenon in the process of consciousness; the phenomenon of the stranger (par. 4), starting with Husserl's V Cartesian Meditation, which opens up a pre-representative and ante-predicative experience, which finds access to the alter-ego in the body, preserving it at At the same time otherness. The fifth paragraph (Phenomenology Beyond Intentions) focuses on the affinities between Husserlian thought and Ronchi's position of radical immanence. The sixth paragraph (The success of a failure) works on the meaning of the phenomenological epoch and its positive effects for a renewed relationship with experience. The last paragraph (On Anthropocentrism) marks the convergence between Husserlian egology and Ronchi's criticism of human finitude, to reaffirm a perspective that is not anthropocentric, but humanly real, of the human being. In conclusion, Husserl's intuitive philosophy of immanence proves capable of moving Ronchi's very philosophy of absolute immanence.