Abstract
[Machine translation] The contribution, starting from the traditional distinction between damage and compensation, aims to identify, and then “systematize”, the fragmentary regulatory data that seem to legitimate, on the one hand, the cause of a “just prejudice” to creditors and, on the other hand, an expropriation of shareholders without compensation. The survey, conducted transversally and taking into account the corrections and additions made by the very recent Legislative Decree no. 136/2024, ends with some food for thought in order to provoke a debate.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Machine translation] From unfair harm (of the CC) to just prejudice (of the C.C.I.I.): a cross-sectional analysis |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1059-1086 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | IL DIRITTO FALLIMENTARE E DELLE SOCIETÀ COMMERCIALI |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- danno
- indennizzo
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] From unfair harm (of the CC) to just prejudice (of the C.C.I.I.): a cross-sectional analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver