TY - JOUR
T1 - Current management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis across Europe: insights from a multinational expert survey
AU - Conticini, Edoardo
AU - Emmi, Giacomo
AU - Grazzini, Silvia
AU - André, Marc
AU - Cohen Tervaert, Jan Willem
AU - Durante, Eugenia
AU - Torracca, Francesca
AU - Mohammad, Aladdin J
AU - Moosig, Frank
AU - Neumann, Thomas
AU - Laque, Roser Solans
AU - Terrier, Benjamin
AU - Vaglio, Augusto
AU - Cameli, Paolo
AU - null, null
AU - Bagnasco, Diego
AU - Benvenuti, Francesco
AU - Berti, Alvise
AU - Bond, Milena
AU - Caminati, Marco
AU - Cassone, Giulia
AU - Cianci, Francesco
AU - Coladonato, Laura
AU - Conti, Fabrizio
AU - Dejaco, Christian
AU - Del Giacco, Stefano
AU - Delvino, Paolo
AU - Ferro, Francesco
AU - Folci, Marco
AU - Lo Gullo, Alberto
AU - Guida, Giuseppe
AU - MALERBA, Mario
AU - Mancini, Riccardo
AU - Milanesi, Alessandra
AU - Monti, Sara
AU - Moroncini, Gianluca
AU - Moroni, Luca
AU - Nolasco, Santi
AU - Noviello, Silvia
AU - Parronchi, Paola
AU - Padoan, Roberto
AU - Pizzimenti Hissaria Pravin, Stefano
AU - RAGNOLI, BEATRICE
AU - Regola, Francesca
AU - Ricciardi, Luisa
AU - Ruaro, Barbara
AU - Salvati, Lorenzo
AU - Walter Volk Schroeder, Jan
AU - Sciascia, Savino
AU - Sebastiani, Marco
AU - Tomietto, Paola
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Objectives: Real-world practice patterns of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) remain poorly defined. This study aimed to describe current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches across experienced European centers, identifying areas of convergence and variability to inform future standardization of care. Methods: We distributed a 44-item online survey covering diagnostic evaluation, treatment strategies, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and the role of patient advocacy groups. The survey was reviewed by an expert panel and disseminated within the European EGPA Study Group. Responses were collected anonymously between April and August 2025 for statistical analysis. Results: Fifty-four experts from six countries participated, most with long-standing experience and substantial EGPA caseloads. Multidisciplinary care and screening for cardiac and renal involvement were widely adopted; histological confirmation was reported in fewer than 25% of cases. Treatment strategies varied considerably: over half of respondents initiated anti-IL-5 therapy at diagnosis, and the combination of glucocorticoids, rituximab, and mepolizumab was the preferred induction regimen in severe disease. Corticosteroid tapering protocols differed, with most clinicians targeting withdrawal within 12 months. PROMs and disease-specific questionnaires were used inconsistently, despite broad recognition of their value. Advocacy groups were viewed as crucial, particularly for patient education and referral. Conclusion: This first multinational survey reveals substantial heterogeneity in real-world diagnostic and therapeutic practice, reflecting gaps in validated criteria, standardized activity measures, and treatment algorithms. These findings highlight the need for coordinated prospective research and harmonized evidence-based guidance to optimize outcomes for patients with EGPA.
AB - Objectives: Real-world practice patterns of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) remain poorly defined. This study aimed to describe current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches across experienced European centers, identifying areas of convergence and variability to inform future standardization of care. Methods: We distributed a 44-item online survey covering diagnostic evaluation, treatment strategies, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and the role of patient advocacy groups. The survey was reviewed by an expert panel and disseminated within the European EGPA Study Group. Responses were collected anonymously between April and August 2025 for statistical analysis. Results: Fifty-four experts from six countries participated, most with long-standing experience and substantial EGPA caseloads. Multidisciplinary care and screening for cardiac and renal involvement were widely adopted; histological confirmation was reported in fewer than 25% of cases. Treatment strategies varied considerably: over half of respondents initiated anti-IL-5 therapy at diagnosis, and the combination of glucocorticoids, rituximab, and mepolizumab was the preferred induction regimen in severe disease. Corticosteroid tapering protocols differed, with most clinicians targeting withdrawal within 12 months. PROMs and disease-specific questionnaires were used inconsistently, despite broad recognition of their value. Advocacy groups were viewed as crucial, particularly for patient education and referral. Conclusion: This first multinational survey reveals substantial heterogeneity in real-world diagnostic and therapeutic practice, reflecting gaps in validated criteria, standardized activity measures, and treatment algorithms. These findings highlight the need for coordinated prospective research and harmonized evidence-based guidance to optimize outcomes for patients with EGPA.
KW - Churg Strauss Syndrome
KW - attitude of health professionals
KW - biological therapies
KW - comorbidity/multimorbidity
KW - education (patients)
KW - outcome measures
KW - vasculitis
KW - Churg Strauss Syndrome
KW - attitude of health professionals
KW - biological therapies
KW - comorbidity/multimorbidity
KW - education (patients)
KW - outcome measures
KW - vasculitis
UR - https://iris.uniupo.it/handle/11579/229442
U2 - 10.1093/rheumatology/keag218
DO - 10.1093/rheumatology/keag218
M3 - Article
SN - 1462-0324
JO - Rheumatology
JF - Rheumatology
ER -