Abstract
[Machine translation] In Italy, the choice to give a child his/her father’s last name was ruled by a tradition which, was the base of a series of legal provisions. By its judgment n. 286/2016, the Italian Constitutional Court, examines the vexata quaestio on the father’s surname and annuls the rule on the automatism of the, attribution of the last name., This comment is mainly focused on the object of the constitutional review: its peculiar features are, shown and analyzed. Particular attention is also devoted to the only parameter that the Court does not use in, its judgment − i.e. article 117, first paragraph, of the Constitution of Italian Republic – and on the reasons, and the effects of this choice., At the end, some perspectives de jure condendo are examined, taking into account what the Court, suggests in its judgment on the need of the legislator’s action in regulating the attribution of the last name.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Machine translation] “Who was your biggest?” : the new response of the Judge of Laws to the question of the automatic attribution of a father's surname. Reflections in the margins of C. cost. sent. n. 286 of 2016 |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | OSSERVATORIO COSTITUZIONALE |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Machine translation] “Who was your biggest?” : the new response of the Judge of Laws to the question of the automatic attribution of a father's surname. Reflections in the margins of C. cost. sent. n. 286 of 2016'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver