Abstract
This bibliographical essay provides an account of Italian scholarship in the history of science. In explaining the historical reasons for the unique patterns of publication that have given Italian scholarship such a strong philosophical orientation, the article also discusses how the overlapping of several factors (the different scholarly traditions, the reform of the academic recruitment system launched in 2010, the obsessive use of metrics in research evaluation, the imposition of absurdly rigid disciplinary boundaries, and rampant clientelism and nepotism) has caused severe distortions in the way scholarly works are produced and valued in Italian academia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-13 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Isis |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue number | S1 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bibliographical distortions, distortive habits: Contextualizing Italian publications in the history of science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver