Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship between temporary workers and innovation. We model a firm’s choice concerning: (i) the mix of temporary and permanent workers; (ii) the optimal level of training intensity that firms choose by best-responding to the worker’s human capital investments. Results suggest that the innovation-enhancing combination of temporary and permanent workers exists and is unique. Using micro-data on Italian firms, we then find that the relationship between the firm-level share of temporary workers and innovation has indeed an inverted U form, in line with our theoretical expectations. This suggests that studies assuming a linear association may oversimplify the complex relationship between non-standard labor and innovation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1121-1144 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Economics of Innovation and New Technology |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Firm-level innovation
- game theory
- human capital accumulation
- learning incentives
- patent data
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Are temporary hires good or bad for innovation? The Italian evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver