Abstract
The ANGELIC methodology was successfully used to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights based on a set of logical rules, with significantly better accuracy than the one achieved by machine learning approaches, as well as to explain the results of reasoning, quite valuable in order to make them trustworthy. This work demonstrates a different logic-based approach, based on Answer Set Programming for solving and generating explanations for solutions. The use of a general knowledge representation and reasoning system, where representation and inference are not tightly coupled, allows for using the same representation for inference tasks different from prediction, thus getting more value out of the domain model, and opens for integrating further forms of knowledge.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 383-386 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
| Event | 36th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - Duration: 1 Jan 2023 → … |
Conference
| Conference | 36th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems |
|---|---|
| Period | 1/01/23 → … |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Answer Set Programming
- Reasoning with Legal Cases
- Computational Models of Argument
- Explanation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Answer Set Programming for Legal Decision Support and Explanation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver