Abstract
Background: The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the advantages of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for treatment of extremely obese women with early-stage endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five extremely obese patients with Body Mass Index >35 kg/m2 and clinical stage I endometrial cancer underwent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingooophorectomy, and in all cases we performed systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy by laparoscopy (mean BMI of 38±7.3 kg/m2) or laparotomy (mean BMI of 39±8.1 kg/m2). Results: In two (4.4%) patients of the laparoscopy group we observed a port site haematoma that was resolved without a second surgery. In three patients of the laparotomy-group, we observed dehiscence of the abdominal suture with surgical site infection that was re-sutured. Conclusion: Laparoscopy can be considered a safe and effective therapeutic procedure for managing early-stage endometrial cancer in extremely obese women with a lower complication rate, lower surgical site infection and postoperative hospitalization.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2497-2502 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Anticancer Research |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Endometrial cancer
- Hysterectomy
- Laparoscopy
- Lymphadenectomy
- Obese women
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Advantages of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in extremely obese women (BMI>35) with early-stage endometrial cancer: A multicenter study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver