Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A simple score for evaluation of the complexity of third-molar extractions

  • Marco Mozzati
  • , Giorgia Gallesio
  • , Alberta Greco Lucchina
  • , Carmen Mortellaro
  • , Laura Bergamasco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: This article proposes a simple preoperative score to evaluate the complexity of tooth extractions of the third mandibular molar and to estimate the time involved. Study Design: We consider 11 factors (demographic, anatomic, and radiologic) that favor the surgery and that can be identified through standard clinical and radiologic examinations. The number of favorable factors (NFF) relative to each patient constitutes his/her score. The analysis of 1500 extractions performed by various surgeons with experience from 2 to 25 years evidences a quadratic inverse correlation between NFF and the time required for the surgery. Results: The shape of the time distribution suggests the existence of 3 major classes of patients characterized by time of 4 to 10 minutes, 11 to 20 minutes, and 21 to 40 minutes. The corresponding NFF brackets, as identified by their frequency distributions and validated by the receiver operating characteristic curve method, are 5 to 11 (mean [SD], 6.8 [1.6]), 2 to 4 (3.3 [1.3]), and 0 to 1 (0.8 [1.0]), respectively. Conclusions: Our results show the good performance of this score as a predictor of the surgical time and its applicability in daily practice regardless of operator experience, background, and level of surgical ability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e515-e519
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Oral surgery
  • Preoperative index
  • Surgical difficulty
  • Third mandibular molar
  • Tooth extraction
  • Tooth impacted

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A simple score for evaluation of the complexity of third-molar extractions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this