Abstract
This paper asks why socialist economics were historically centered on public ownership of industry, despite its mam drawbacks, and offers an explanation founded on rational individual choice. It first shows that the Marxian program of state socialism was subject to intense competition from alternative blueprints by the turn of the 20th century. It then argues that the superiority of the Marxian program lay in the contract enforcement property of an arrangement in which a politicized bureaucracy in charge of production was accountable to a party controlled by the workers. Formally, in a setting in which all participants are selfish and rational, the workers' sole objective is redistribution, and an initial system choice has to be made. Party-state control of enterprises turns out to be the optimal contract between a principal (the workers) and its agent (the party) for a one-lime transaction plagued by extreme informational asymmetry. Finally, modifications of this choice setting and implications for the decline of, and transition from, communism are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 371-397 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Rationality and Society |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Political exchange
- Principal-agent model
- Public ownership
- Rational choice
- Socialism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A rational theory of socialist public ownership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver