A note on the vita aesopi, recension g, 69–70

Luigi Battezzato

doi:10.1093/cq/49.2.647

A note on the vita aesopi, recension g, 69–70

Luigi Battezzato

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The recension G of the Vita Aesopi has received a fair amount of attention after the editio princeps by Perry. In recent years, Papathomopoulos and Ferrari have emended scores of corrupt passages in their fine editions. I will offer only one note, dealing with a section that has been left unclear.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	647-648
Number of pages	2
Journal	Classical Quarterly
Volume	49
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/49.2.647
Publication status	Published - Dec 1999
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1093/cq/49.2.647

Cite this

@article{553062075de746a69affadd66226c3d7,

title = "A note on the vita aesopi, recension g, 69–70",

abstract = "The recension G of the Vita Aesopi has received a fair amount of attention after the editio princeps by Perry. In recent years, Papathomopoulos and Ferrari have emended scores of corrupt passages in their fine editions. I will offer only one note, dealing with a section that has been left unclear.",

author = "Luigi Battezzato",

year = "1999",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1093/cq/49.2.647",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "647--648",

journal = "Classical Quarterly",

issn = "0009-8388",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A note on the vita aesopi, recension g, 69–70

AU - Battezzato, Luigi

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - The recension G of the Vita Aesopi has received a fair amount of attention after the editio princeps by Perry. In recent years, Papathomopoulos and Ferrari have emended scores of corrupt passages in their fine editions. I will offer only one note, dealing with a section that has been left unclear.

AB - The recension G of the Vita Aesopi has received a fair amount of attention after the editio princeps by Perry. In recent years, Papathomopoulos and Ferrari have emended scores of corrupt passages in their fine editions. I will offer only one note, dealing with a section that has been left unclear.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85007989612

U2 - 10.1093/cq/49.2.647

DO - 10.1093/cq/49.2.647

M3 - Article

SN - 0009-8388

VL - 49

SP - 647

EP - 648

JO - Classical Quarterly

JF - Classical Quarterly

IS - 2

ER -

A note on the vita aesopi, recension g, 69–70

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this