Abstract
The aim of the paper is to formally relate logical Horn models and Bayesian Networks (BNs) in the framework of diagnostic reasoning. This is pursued by pointing out similarities between the two formalisms at the modeling level and by introducing into BNs a suitable notion of derivation. We also discuss modeling issues underlying the choice of Horn-based models vs BNs, by making explicit the “completion semantics” underlying a BN. This correspondence between “completed” Horn theories and BNs allows us to formally justify classical diagnostic schemata adopted for BNs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 254-265 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1997 |
| Event | 5th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA-97) - Roma, Italy Duration: 1 Jan 1997 → … |
Conference
| Conference | 5th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA-97) |
|---|---|
| City | Roma, Italy |
| Period | 1/01/97 → … |
Keywords
- Horn models
- Bayesian Networks
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative analysis of Horn models and Bayesian Networks for diagnosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver